Workday, Sprout & BambooHR integrations — built and run for you

Why this list is short

Connector catalogs grow the easy way: a logo goes up the day an API exists, and nobody tells you whether it means an integration someone will stand behind or a half-day proof of concept. This page grows the hard way. A system is listed as Supported only when we'll put the whole service behind it — not a connector license, the whole operation:

• Every data domain in your scope, each flowing the right way — employee and org data down to payroll, time and leave back up, comp down and payroll results back for a typical pair. What syncs, and which way →
• Validation before anything writes — records that aren't payroll-ready are quarantined with a plain-English reason, never silently dropped. How quarantine works →
• A parallel run before go-live — the sync runs against a real payroll cycle and you compare the outputs before cutover. How implementation works →
• The dashboard, alerts, and reconciliation reports — every run, every record, every exception, visible. Explore the platform →
• The 99.5% SLA with service credits — measured monthly, in the contract. Read the SLA →
• Connector maintenance in the monthly fee — Workday ships a release, a local vendor changes an API: updating and re-testing the connector is our work. Change management, on the Product page →

That's the bar a system clears before it enters the Supported row. We'd rather publish a short list that's true than a long one that's aspirational. At payroll cutoff, the only integration that matters is yours.

Workday ↔ Sprout integration ¶

If you searched for exactly this pair, you're in the right place.

Most integration vendors can talk Workday. The Philippine half is where they go vague. Semi-monthly payroll means the sync has to be right twice a month, not once. Thirteenth-month pay, leave conversions, and government ID numbers are ordinary fields here, not edge cases. And four agencies — BIR, SSS, PhilHealth, Pag-IBIG — each expect their own outputs on their own deadlines. That half is what we specialize in. It's why OmniSync HR exists.

What a Workday ↔ Sprout engagement covers:

• Hires, movements, and terminations approved in Workday land in Sprout on the next scheduled sync — validated first, quarantined with a plain-English reason if a record isn't ready. The termination that slips past cutoff is the record this platform exists to catch.
• Time, attendance, and leave from Sprout flow back, so Workday reflects what actually happened on the ground.
• Compensation changes flow down so they reach payroll before cutoff; after each run, the payroll register flows back to Workday, so global reporting shows what was actually paid.
• Exactly which fields map to which is fixed in your week-2 mapping document — versioned, signed off, yours. Only what's in that document moves. See what syncs, and which way →

How it connects: a Workday ISU you create, scoped to only the objects and fields your mapping document names, and a scoped Sprout API credential under the same rule — vendor-supported APIs on both ends, revocable by you any time. How it connects, on the Product page →

Cadence: you set it — hourly to daily — against your payroll calendar.

Running PH statutory filings? Add the Compliance Pack (+$500/month) and your BIR, SSS, PhilHealth, and Pag-IBIG outputs are generated from the same synced data your payroll ran on. Details below.

Going live: 4–6 weeks, after a parallel run against a real Sprout payroll cycle. Forward this to IT: the whole ask on your side is the scoped service account, one mapping workshop, and a UAT contact — hours, not weeks. How implementation works →

From $10,000 setup + $2,249/month as a Standard pair, 99.5% SLA included. Full pricing →

Book a scoping call — a fixed quote for Workday ↔ Sprout within a week.

On the roadmap ¶

Status means something specific on this page:

A roadmap row is not a waiting list. If your pair includes a system marked Planned, don't wait for the label to change — bring it to a scoping call: we'll tell you honestly what's already built, what isn't, and what your quote covers to close the gap. There's no upvote button here — a scoping call is the vote. How that answer gets decided ↓

The rule that governs this page: a name moves up when the work is real — never when it's merely announced. If a status here ever looks conservative, it is. That's the same standard we'll apply to your payroll data.

Not on the list? That's a scoping call, not a dead end.

Nobody lands on this page by accident. If you searched for your exact pair and it isn't here, that doesn't disqualify you — it's the reason to talk. New connectors are built as part of client engagements — that isn't a workaround; it's the standard route. Here's how the answer gets decided:

• Your system has a vendor-supported API. The standard route. The connector is built as part of your engagement and runs under the same validation, dashboard, and SLA as every supported pair.
• No usable API. Screen-based or direct-database connectivity is available as custom scope — priced in your quote, with a connection-specific SLA scoped to how it connects. We'll tell you which route your system needs before you see a quote.
• We're the wrong tool. Then we'll tell you that on the call, and you'll have lost nothing but the call.

One honest note: a first-of-its-kind connector is scoped as exactly that. Published prices are starting prices for typical two-system integrations — if your system needs more, the quote says so up front, not in a change order later.